Instagram,
the popular mobile photo-sharing service now owned by Facebook, said
Tuesday that it will remove language from its new terms of service
suggesting that users' photos could appear in advertisements.
The
language in question had appeared in updated policies announced Monday
and scheduled to take effect Jan. 16. After an outcry on social media
and privacy rights blogs, the company clarified that it has no plans to
put users' photos in ads.
That said, Instagram maintains that it
was created to become a business and would like to experiment with
various forms of advertisements to make money. Instagram doesn't
currently run any ads. As of now, the free service has no way to make
money and brings in no revenue to Facebook.
"Our main goal is to
avoid things likes advertising banners you see in other apps that would
hurt the Instagram user experience," Instagram co-founder Kevin Systrom
wrote in a blog post Tuesday.
What had riled users and privacy
advocates was Instagram's new assertion that it may now receive payments
from businesses to use its members' photos, user name and other data
"in connection with paid or sponsored content or promotions, without any
compensation" to them.
Instagram didn't offer many details at the
time. Its blog post on Monday made no mention of ads or other
commercial activities, though it offered links to the new privacy policy
and terms of service. Those documents spell out what the service could
do, but say little about actual plans.
Instead, Instagram merely
said the changes will help its service "function more easily as part of
Facebook by being able to share info between the two groups." Facebook
Inc. also recently updated its privacy policy to allow for more
integration with Instagram.
"This means we can do things like
fight spam more effectively, detect system and reliability problems more
quickly, and build better features for everyone by understanding how
Instagram is used," the earlier blog post said, adding that the updates
also "help protect you, and prevent spam and abuse as we grow."
Facebook bought Instagram in September for $715.3 million, $300 million of it in cash and the rest in stock.
Instagram's
new policy, which takes effect Jan. 16, suggests that Facebook wants to
integrate Instagram into its ad-serving system.
"These services
are publicly advertised as `free,' but the free label masks costs to
privacy, which include the responsibility of monitoring how these
companies sell data, and even how they change policies over time," said
Chris Hoofnagle, director of Information Privacy Programs at the
Berkeley Center for Law & Technology.
The fast-growing service
has become a popular way to share photos from cellphones. The Instagram
app, available for the iPhone and Android devices, offers a variety of
filters to give photos a retro feel or other look. Although many other
apps also offer filters for enhancing photos, they don't offer the
sharing features and community aspects of Instagram.
Instagram has
had a loyal following since before Facebook bought it. The purchase
worried some of the earliest fans of the service, who feared Facebook
would swallow up their beloved community.
Users must accept the new terms when they go into effect or leave the Instagram.
Twitter
users were vowing to cancel their Instagram accounts. They complained
that the new terms would essentially let the service sell people's
photos for ads - something Instagram said Tuesday it doesn't plan to do.
Facebook's stock price increased nearly 4 percent on Tuesday amid the Instagram ads chatter, to close at $27.71.
source
0 Comments:
Post a Comment